UPDATE: APRA announced it will increase the mortgage serviceability buffer from 2.5% to 3.0%.

The Council of Financial Regulators' (CFR) - which includes the RBA, APRA, ASIC and the Australian Treasury - joint statement said despite lockdowns hampering transactions, property prices are "still rising briskly".

"The Council is mindful that a period of credit growth materially outpacing growth in household income would add to the medium-term risks facing the economy, notwithstanding that lending standards remain sound," the statement said.

This follows recent ABS data which showed average wealth per capita exceeded $520,000 off the back of strong home price growth, though debt per capita rose to $102,000, and around $130,000 when excluding minors.

While the RBA's remit isn't to specifically address housing affordability, its key role is to maintain Australia's financial stability, which could be affected by runaway housing prices.

"Over the next couple of months, APRA also plans to publish an information paper on its framework for implementing macroprudential policy," the statement said.

Such policies tabled include a clamp down on debt to income (DTI) levels. The latest data shows more than one fifth of all new loans written were for home buyers borrowing more than six-times their income.

However, former RBA economist and current chief economist at the Centre for Independent Studies, Peter Tulip, said addressing DTI has no economic rationale.

"The interest burden on many properties is now less than the rent. But APRA is about to tell borrowers that they cannot afford the loan," Mr Tulip told Savings.com.au.

"This restricts home ownership to those with the wealth to have substantial equity in their home. It is unfair and inefficient, for no obvious prudential gain."

"At record low interest rates, sensible asset-to-income and hence debt-to-income ratios are much higher than in the past."

Accessibility vs Affordability

The argument against clamping down on DTI ratios highlights that it will affect home buyers' accessibility to get a mortgage, rather than actually addressing housing affordability.

"The main public concern with rising house prices is that housing is becoming unaffordable, in particular for young families that have difficulty saving a deposit," Mr Tulip said.

"Lending restrictions like DTI limits will make it even harder to get a loan – especially for those with little savings."

REA Group economist Cameron Kusher, writing for the Australian Business Review, said a clampdown on DTI would be "counterproductive" for owner occupiers.

"Although people may be taking out mortgages on marginally higher DTI ratios than those in the past, this is a function of the lowest mortgage rates on record leading to the ratio of housing interest repayments to household income sitting at its lowest share since 1999," Mr Kusher said.

Recent Government stimulus policies designed to get Australians into the housing market include HomeBuilder, the First Home Loan Deposit Scheme, and the Family Home Guarantee.

"Given improving home ownership rates is the goal of these government schemes, it seems counterproductive to limit first-home buyers by reducing their ability to borrow," Mr Kusher said.

Propertyology property analyst Simon Pressley was blunt in his assessment of potential APRA crackdowns.

"Their [APRA's] track record for considering big-picture consequences is not good," Mr Pressley said earlier in September.

"One can only hope that the APRA Board does not wish to leave a legacy as economic destroyers and dream-breakers."

See Also: Which generation had it harder for home buying? Baby Boomers vs Gen X vs Millennials

So, what's the solution then?

Much of the boost in lending over the past year has been through owner occupiers, though investors are slowly coming back into the market after APRA clamped down on investment lending between 2014 and 2018.

Speaking to the Australian Financial Review on Tuesday, Treasurer Josh Frydenberg toed the CFR's stance.

"We must be mindful of the balance between credit and income growth to prevent the build-up of future risks in the financial system," Mr Frydenberg said.

"Carefully targeted and timely adjustments are sometimes necessary.

"A positive feature of this housing cycle compared to that of the last is a higher proportion of first home buyers and owner occupiers entering the market."

Mr Tulip proposed another lever the regulators can pull to address housing accessibility and affordability - one that puts the onus of financial stability onto banks and not borrowers.

"We have a policy – the Countercyclical Capital Buffer (CCyB) - that is explicitly designed to address that problem," he said.

"A direct and efficient way to avoid bank failures is to increase bank equity. Make sure banks have a sufficient buffer to handle any losses.

"It is based on substantial research that finds that increasing bank equity is both effective in reducing bank failures and relatively low cost."

Mr Kusher recommended "more subtle" ways to cool the market, including lifting mortgage serviceability assessment floors.

In June CommBank did exactly that - it lifted its serviceability buffer from 5.1% to 5.25%. 

Rising debt to income levels also has the heads of the major banks concerned, with CBA chief Matt Comyn saying last week the bank was "increasingly concerned".

ANZ chief Shayne Elliott said there are "some emerging signs of stress", while Westpac chief Peter King has previously said affordability at the moment is "pretty stretched". 

Did it work in New Zealand?

New Zealand has so far experienced much stronger home price growth than Australia, and its Reserve Bank (RBNZ) has introduced various restrictions on loan-to-value ratios, particularly for investors.

Such restrictions include: 

  • Restricting 80%+ LVR loans to owner occupiers to 10% of new loans (from 1 November)
  • Restricting 60%+ LVR loans to investors to 5% of new loans.

This means the majority of owner occupiers need a 20% deposit, and the majority of investors need a 40% deposit, dubbed the so called '20/10' and '40/5' rules.

For owner occupiers, the rule was set to be tightened from '20/20' on 1 October but was pushed back to 1 November due to ongoing Covid economic challenges.

LVR requirements were scrapped at the onset of the Covid pandemic in 2020, but were re-instated in March.

Various industry pundits in New Zealand also said the rules essentially pulled forward demand for lending prior to the new restrictions taking place.

CoreLogic NZ's figures from January show 30% of all lending went to investors - a 15-year high.


Advertisement

Buying a home or looking to refinance? The table below features home loans with some of the lowest interest rates on the market for owner occupiers.

Update resultsUpdate
LenderHome LoanInterest Rate Comparison Rate* Monthly Repayment Repayment type Rate Type Offset Redraw Ongoing Fees Upfront Fees Max LVR Lump Sum Repayment Additional Repayments Split Loan Option TagsFeaturesLinkComparePromoted ProductDisclosure
6.04% p.a.
6.06% p.a.
$3,011
Principal & Interest
Variable
$0
$530
90%
4.6 Star Customer Ratings
  • Available for purchase or refinance, min 10% deposit needed to qualify.
  • No application, ongoing monthly or annual fees.
  • Quick and easy online application process.
Disclosure
5.99% p.a.
5.90% p.a.
$2,995
Principal & Interest
Variable
$0
$0
80%
Apply in minutes
  • No application or ongoing fees. Annual rate discount
  • Unlimited redraws & additional repayments. LVR <80%
  • A low-rate variable home loan from a 100% online lender. Backed by the Commonwealth Bank.
Disclosure
6.09% p.a.
6.11% p.a.
$3,027
Principal & Interest
Variable
$0
$250
60%
  • No annual fees – None!
  • Get fast pre-approval
  • Unlimited additional repayments free of charge
Disclosure
5.69% p.a.
6.16% p.a.
$2,899
Principal & Interest
Fixed
$0
$530
90%
  • Available for purchase or refinance, min 10% deposit needed to qualify.
  • No application, ongoing monthly or annual fees.
  • Flexibility to split your loan with both fixed and variable rates
Disclosure
Important Information and Comparison Rate Warning

Base criteria of: a $400,000 loan amount, variable, fixed, principal and interest (P&I) home loans with an LVR (loan-to-value) ratio of at least 80%. However, the ‘Compare Home Loans’ table allows for calculations to be made on variables as selected and input by the user. Some products will be marked as promoted, featured or sponsored and may appear prominently in the tables regardless of their attributes. All products will list the LVR with the product and rate which are clearly published on the product provider’s website. Monthly repayments, once the base criteria are altered by the user, will be based on the selected products’ advertised rates and determined by the loan amount, repayment type, loan term and LVR as input by the user/you. *The Comparison rate is based on a $150,000 loan over 25 years. Warning: this comparison rate is true only for this example and may not include all fees and charges. Different terms, fees or other loan amounts might result in a different comparison rate. Rates correct as of . View disclaimer.

Important Information and Comparison Rate Warning

Photo by Jesse Collins on Unsplash





Ready, Set, Buy!


Learn everything you need to know about buying property – from choosing the right property and home loan, to the purchasing process, tips to save money and more!

With bonus Q&A sheet and Crossword!

By subscribing you agree to our privacy policy